Clinical AI Red-Teaming

AI companies deploying medical AI in clinical settings who need to identify safety risks before they reach patients. Critical for pre-launch safety assessment, regulatory submissions, and ongoing safety monitoring of deployed systems.

01  /  Overview
What we do

Find the failures before patients do.

01.A / Thesis
  1. 01

    We conduct structured adversarial testing of medical AI systems across 10 clinically-derived failure mode categories.

  2. 02

    Our red-team evaluators — trained clinicians — systematically probe for dangerous dosing recommendations, false reassurance, contraindication failures, hallucinated diagnoses, and other safety-critical failure modes.

  3. 03

    Each engagement produces a severity-weighted safety report with specific mitigation recommendations.

01.B / In practice
HallucinationDosage ErrorScope CreepBiasOmissionContradiction87%catch rate
02  /  Deliverables
02.A / What you get

Every engagement, audit-ready.

Structured outputs you can take to clinical safety reviews, procurement, and regulators — with the underlying methodology referenced throughout.

  1. 01

    Structured adversarial testing across 10 failure mode categories

  2. 02

    Severity-weighted safety report with clinical impact analysis

  3. 03

    Specific mitigation recommendations per failure mode

  4. 04

    Coverage metrics showing which risk categories were tested

  5. 05

    Re-testing protocol for validating fixes

Why EnterTheLoop  /  03

A clinician-developed taxonomy of medical AI failures — not generic adversarial prompts.

Our red-team methodology is built on a clinician-developed taxonomy of medical AI failures — not generic adversarial testing. Our evaluators understand how clinical AI fails in practice because they work in healthcare. They know which questions a GP would ask, which drug interactions a pharmacist would catch, and which triage decisions could harm patients.